× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: Upgrading from V3R2 to V5Rx
  • From: "Salter, James" <JSalter@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 08:52:49 -0600

We "lost" our upgrade path from a model 510 and 530 box to a newer box, yet
we decided to 
purchase a newer 830 model outright.

Our situation is a little different than yours because we kept the software
somewhat current.

If you can't justify getting a newer box and system, I wouldn't move to a
newer box.

In our case, staying with the model 510 and model 530 box would cost about
the same as purchasing a newer 830 box, with
software subscriptions, maintenance, etc. all being considered.

Someone else may know of some software problems related to losing this path
to which I am not familiar.  



-----Original Message-----
From: Shrader, Patrick [mailto:pshrader@wkep.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 8:20 AM
To: Midrange Mail List
Subject: Upgrading from V3R2 to V5Rx


The latest copy (Jan 2001) of Midrange Computing announces that the V4R3 is
no longer for sale, and that it is required for upgrading to the later
releases (V4R5 & V5R1). It is understandable that IBM wants everyone on the
latest hardware and software releases to reduce support costs.

While I would love to move from V3R2 to V4R3, there are limitations to
making this move. Since I am still on a CISC box, a direct upgrade is not an
option for me. Yes, I want to upgrade, but the existing box does what we
need it to do right now and we are investing in capital projects that
directly improves our bottom line (more than what the cost savings of a new
system will). There is no sense in having a great computer if your core
(non-IT) operations needs improvements and upgrades -- after all, computers
should be tools, not life.

However, when we do move up to the RISC boxes, what types of trouble will
this (and other similar) announcements from IBM do to me and others in the
same boat? The CISC to RISC is not a straight forward process, and now
without certain operating systems available, what does this do to my upgrade
path?

Are upgrades of this type better handled by starting from a clean box, and
restoring user libraries from the old system? We are a MAPICS shop, which
will require data migration and reinstallation.

Basically, how big a deal is this type of announcement -- long and
complicated, or just blowing smoke?

Patrick Shrader

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
+---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.