|
Why should IBM be dinged for selling a PC based product that "isn't complete". I'm under the impression that Microsoft has been using that approach for years. As far as problems with Code/400 go - yea we had a few, but the pain was well worth the benefit. Coding writing productivity is up at least 30% and with tools like the navigator, our vendor supplied needless complicated and convoluted programs are easier to understand. > -----Original Message----- > From: Leslie Russell [SMTP:leslier@datrek.com] > Sent: Friday, August 11, 2000 10:56 AM > To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com > Subject: Re: Replace SEU with Code/400??? > > Why do you call that risky, M$ has done the very same thing since DOS 6. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Pascal Bellerose <pascal.bellerose@progisys.com> > To: 'MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com' <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com> > Date: Friday, August 11, 2000 7:52 AM > Subject: RE: Replace SEU with Code/400??? > > > Hello William, > > I'm happy you had no problems installing it. Some of us have > experienced it, and finally gave up. IBM has taken a direction that is > pretty risky. They entered the PC market with products that they aren't > finished developing. They expected the customers to tell them what's > wrong with it and what's missing, but they're missing a point there, > they're not asking the right questions to the right people. (see news400's > august article > :http://www.as400network.com/resources/artarchive/index.cfm?fuseaction=vie > warticle&CO_ContentID=7750). > > The point is they have put CODE/400 on the market before it > was finished. They had put only the tools that everybody need. I've > heard it was written in smalltalk, and that was one of the major cause why > it is so slow. But they will release a new version that is supposed to be > faster, and more reliable. Written in C/C++, it is supposed to be the > next step to a Full windoze interface for AS400 developers. As I'm > writing this, there are no more CODE/400 on my workstation. I had to > format my HDD to completely erase the references to the VARPG's Java > toolbox for as400. Or else I have to set the classpath in each execution > of a Java class to avoid a "java.lang.ClassNotFoundException" error. > > All this to say, don't despair, there will come a new world of > drags, drops and clicks for the AS400. Will it be for good? who knows? > > > > Pascal Bellerose > Programmeur-analyste / Software developer > pascal.bellerose@progisys.com > > PROGISYS inc. > Téléphone / Telephone : (418) 871-4880 > Télécopieur / Fax : (418) 871-0486 > Site internet / Website : www.PROGISYS.com > Courriel / E-mail : progisys@progisys.com > > > > << File: ATT04264.txt >> << File: Message Body >> +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.