Re: is operating system always to blame, was: Ready to scrap an AS/400

Hi Mark,

From: Mark Walter <mwalter@netrax.net>
> What if there is that outside chance that a job in normal operation could
> write xxxxx number of records or utilize more than 70% of the CPU. If the
> OS stopped it, it would be considered a bug in the OS.

Well personally I wouldn't consider it a bug in the OS. Better that one job
be put on hold and the operator notified of the situation than crashing the
OS and having all jobs zapped.

> I know that a
> program that would suck that many machine cycles would be extremely bad
> design, but I'm sure that somewhere they exist. (Albeit, not in my shop.
> HA,HA,HA).

Of course not! Everyone on this list writes top notch code don't they? <VBG>

> I think we'll have to agree to disagree on this one.

Shucks, just when I thought I was about to convert you<G>!

Regards,
Peter Dow
Dow Software Services, Inc.
909 425-0194 voice
909 425-0196 fax


> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to
MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
> +---


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---