RE: Filtering Messages (was: *** Admin thoughts (was Product Enha ncement by Voting?))

[Chris Bipes <chris.bipes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I am on Outlook 2000 and have the same problem.  I liked the suggestion
about the reply to: but could not define a rule to look at it.  So I agree
with Joe's request of filtering/mangling ;-) e-mails before being
re-distributed.  What about stripping out HTML or rejecting them as well?
What about stripping off the trailer that Majordomo adds while your at it.
Can Majordomo do this?   Is there one out there that can?  Any one know and
can help David on this?



Christopher K. Bipes     mailto:ChrisB@Cross-Check.com
Sr. Programmer/Analyst   mailto:Chris_Bipes@Yahoo.com
CrossCheck, Inc.         http://www.cross-check.com
6119 State Farm Drive    Phone: 707 586-0551 x 1102
Rohnert Park CA  94928 Fax: 707 586-1884

If consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, only geniuses work here.
Karen Herbelin - Readers Digest 3/2000


-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Giusto [mailto:JGiusto@patuxent.com]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 7:07 AM
To: 'MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com'
Subject: RE: Filtering Messages (was: *** Admin thoughts (was Product
Enha ncement by Voting?))

David, 

   Is there anyway that you could have the To: header changed to something
standard (different ones for each list) before being re-broadcast?  This
would allow us [that can't use the reply to:] to use one rule that would
catch them all.


Joe Giusto II
Patuxent Publishing Company
10750 Little Patuxent Parkway
Columbia, MD 21044
mailto:JGiusto@patuxent.com <mailto:jgiusto@patuxent.com> 
http://www.lifegoeson.com <http://lifegoeson.com> 
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---