× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. June 2000

Re: SAVSTG



> I'm curious.  Would a savstg use approximately the same
> amount of tape space,
> and take approximately the same amount of time, as a
> GO SAVE option 21?

Yes, it uses roughly the same amound of tape space, but it is somewhat faster. A
restore is a lot faster, especially if you have large logical files (and you
used the default ACCPTH(*NO) during save) and/or you have a lot of members in
files. And SAVSTG also saves things like spoolfiles, contents of dataqueues etc.
SAVSTG is ideal to use before an OS/400-upgrade.

M.Sjardin - Blue IT Group


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.