× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: AS/400 MIPS specifications
  • From: rburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Burger, Robert)
  • Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 18:12:19 -0500

I should have (and intended to but forgot) mentioned in my original message
that I realized the MIPS number was meaningless.  However, it is one of the
numbers they asked for so I was trying to provide.  I also thought it might
be interesting to show a comparison of the AS/400 620 MIPS / dollar versus
the MIPS / dollar of the mainframe they seem to be defending.  This is all
part of a nasty political war where user departments / agencies are sick of
the mainframe and the central IT department and a suppossedly impartial
(yeah right) consultant has been hired to tell the County Commissioners
whether the future is the mainframe or something else.

Do any of you kind folks that replied happen to know if the CPW ratings are
used on IBM mainframe models... I guess I'll do some hunting tonight.
Anyhow, thanks for the responses.

--Robert


-----Original Message-----
From: jpcarr@TREDEGAR.COM <jpcarr@TREDEGAR.COM>
To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com>
Date: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 4:32 PM
Subject: Re: AS/400 MIPS specifications




>I am currently filling out a consultant survey that  asks for MIPS rating
of our various systems. I have searched high and low  >for approximate
MIPS ratings for my two AS/400 systems but cannot find  them. Does anyone
know either where to find >them or what they are for the  following
(ballpark is probably good enough):
>Model 620 with 2180 Processor
>Model 170 with 2290 Processor
>Thanks in advance,
>Robert E. Burger


The answer is *NULL.

Or,   "How tall is the Empire State Building,   True or False?

Any number you use, would be misleading and invalid.     It must be a old
survey,  There are much better measurements now to gauge a machine than
MIPS.    Java benchmarks,  Ramp-C,  etc, etc.

John Carr







+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
+---

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.