|
At 01:47 PM 5/23/00 -0600, Nathan M. Andelin wrote: >.............. Part of the reason for this is because under common >law the employer-employee relationship is characterized as a master-servant >relationship. The servant does the work, the master owns the property. >Does this sound a little like slavery? > And the "servant" gets paid. And, anytime, he can quit, give up slavery -and salary- and he is free to become a "master", as so nicely you put it. If memory does not play tricks, being a slave was not an elective option....slaves were owed and had no personal rights... EndreE +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.