RE: Client Access & Rumba co-existence

Dan,

     It may be that they want you to use Rumba because they have invested a 
substantial amount of money in it.  This is the reason I was told that I 
had to stick with Rumba.



On Friday, May 12, 2000 12:42 PM, Bale, Dan [SMTP:DBale@lear.com] wrote:
| Since I started here about one month ago in a multi-AS/400 environment, 
I've
| been using Rumba version 6.0 on an NT 4.0 workstation and I hate it.  I 
have
| asked if I could get Client Access installed and was told that there are
| problems with Rumba and Client Access co-existing.  The source of this
| information was unable to be more specific than that.  Does anyone have 
any
| experience with this?
|
| I don't want to cause problems where I have to be "rescued" or where I'd
| have to spend more than 30 minutes recovering from problems.  If I knew 
that
| there would be no problems using CA in this environment, I would gladly
| uninstall Rumba before installing CA.
|
| TIA,
| Dan Bale
|
| +---
| | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| | To unsubscribe from this list send email to 
MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: 
david@midrange.com
| +---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---