× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: Discontinuance of support for the *M36
  • From: "M. Lazarus" <mlazarus@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 04 May 2000 23:25:30 -0400

Al,

At 5/4/00 09:52 AM -0400, you wrote:
1)  The costs to IBM for supporting this feature must be relatively low, since it's considered to be stable.

This probably costs more than you think, because many of these customers lack the necessary AS/400 skills, so they need an excessive amount of customer support.

 The /36 customer is paying for support, just like any other customer.  Since the /36 has been out of "new circulation" for quite a few years now, most will be veterans.  I don't think they need that much support.


2)  The "experiment" to push S/36 customers over to the AS/400, when the AS/400 first came out, failed miserably.  Why would IBM want to go through that embarrassment again?

The S/36 customer represents small potatoes to IBM, and if it doesn't generate profit, they don't care about it.

 Small customers can become large customers.  It's not a good idea to alienate them.

 -mark

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.