Re: Discontinuance of support for the *M36

> Your comments interest me.  I have started working with a small shop that
> has had their Sys/36 running with code that was untouched after 1984 and
> 1988.  In October they ordered a new AS/400 and their Business Partner
> installed it with the old code and *M36 then a few months later moved it
> all over to the AS/400 side running in Sys36 mode.  The entire package was
> reasonably priced, and while I didn't understand the two step change-over,
> it has proven very successful.  The installation was on-time and
> on-budget.  In today's world of slipping deadlines, scope-creep, budget
> overruns, and train wrecks this is a pretty good case for IBM's track
> record regarding compatibility.  In my opinion.


i remember those days.  

we had several 36 clients that were horrified at the cost of the
as/400.  the big rack mounted systems were $100,000+ to replace a system
36 that cost about $40,000.  and maintenance was $600 per month.

ibm did a good job of scaring 36 people from buying the little 9404
systems. some customers, they scared right out of the platform!  unibol
had a field day!  i remember a big ibm promotion sales video, the theme
was 'get them into the rack', the primary reason was there was a $750
bonus if you could pull that off! i think ibm totally misjudged their
market.  

nj
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---