× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: Logical Files vs. Physical Keys
  • From: Gwecnal@xxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 14:30:37 EST

In a message dated 00-03-23 13:32:18 EST, MCUNNING@pct.edu writes:

> I don't know if it's still a fact but 10 years ago when we set our
>  standards an unkeyed PF would copy 1,000 times faster than an unkeyed PF
>  when it came time to add a field and copy the old PF to the new. 

Well, then you have to create the logical that gives you keyed access. I 
believe that if you add in the time it takes to create the logical, it is 
near enough a wash.  (I assume you did not mean unkeyed to unkeyed).
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.