|
In a message dated 00-03-23 13:32:18 EST, MCUNNING@pct.edu writes: > I don't know if it's still a fact but 10 years ago when we set our > standards an unkeyed PF would copy 1,000 times faster than an unkeyed PF > when it came time to add a field and copy the old PF to the new. Well, then you have to create the logical that gives you keyed access. I believe that if you add in the time it takes to create the logical, it is near enough a wash. (I assume you did not mean unkeyed to unkeyed). +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.