× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: Logical Files vs. Physical Keys
  • From: "Bale, Dan" <DBale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 10:28:14 -0500

No, the reason why many shops kept the physical unkeyed was because,
apparently, in the early days (S/38 and early AS/400?), if the access path
on a physical file became corrupted, there was a good chance that you could
not recover the data from the physical file.  From what I've heard over the
years, this has become less of a risk.  Perhaps even no risk, but I'll defer
to others more knowledgeable than me.

Otherwise, I am unaware of any reason why you should not key the physical
file.  Someone else already mentioned this, and I concur, that the physical
file should be defined with a unique key.

My .02

- Dan Bale

-----Original Message-----
From: Kmcmann@marzetti.com [mailto:Kmcmann@marzetti.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2000 8:35 AM
To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
Subject: RE: Logical Files vs. Physical Keys


I don't know if this might have been your reason, but way back on the S/36,
we did the same thing, just because changes could be made to alternative
index keys, but not to parent file keys.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Entwistle [SMTP:bentwist@famousfootwear.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 6:16 PM
> To:   MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> Subject:      Logical Files vs. Physical Keys
> 
> 
> 
> When we started out on the AS400 11 years ago, a decision was made to
> always use
> logical files and never use physical keys (index) on all of our files.  At
> this
> point, this is being reevaluated and no one seems to remember why physical
> keys
> were seen as a bad thing.
> 
> Anyone able to give a short synopsis of the tradeoffs between the two?
> Any
> downsides to using physical keys or indexes?
> 
> Bob
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to
> MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
> david@midrange.com
> +---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
+---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.