× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: Need 2 cents on multiple libraries
  • From: Tim McCarthy <timm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 12:53:20 -0500

From the manageability/authorization standpoint the multi-library
approach has benefits; from the reporting view the keyed file method has
advantages. If you go the multiple library way at least incorporate and
use the company/branch code field in the database. That way you have the
option to merge the files or add logicals later.  

TrailBlazer Systems, Inc.
http://www.as400ftp.com
AS/400 Communications & E-Commerce Solutions

Errors have been made. Others will be blamed.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Erickson [SMTP:jerickson@800.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 12:07 PM
> To:   'MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com'
> Subject:      RE: Need 2 cents on multiple libraries
> 
> Consider user/reporting access authority between branches.  Users may
> require access to multiple branches at once, or even switch between
> branches
> for inquiry/report/maintenance.
> 
> I think I'd vote for a branch code field key and one library approach.
> You
> could either define logicals with select/omit or opnqryf selection
> criteria
> for access methods.
> 
> Good luck, let us know which method you choose...
> 
> Regards,
> Jon A. Erickson
> Sr. Programmer Analyst
> 800.COM Inc.
> 1516 NW Thurman St
> Portland, OR  97209-2517
> 
> Direct: 503.944.3613
> Fax: 503.944.3690
> Web: http://800.com
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julie Francis [mailto:jfrancis6222@voyager.net]
> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 7:29 AM
> To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> Subject: Need 2 cents on multiple libraries
> 
> 
> Hello All,
> We are setting up a new work order system for a company with multiple
> branches.  We are debating between using one database library per
> branch
> vs. a branch code field key and one library.  These files will be
> large
> and in use 24 hours per day and there will be no shared information
> between the branches.  May I have your comments on your experience
> with
> using either/or.  TIA   Julie
> 
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to
> MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
> david@midrange.com
> +---
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to
> MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
> david@midrange.com
> +---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.