|
Rick, >What happened to the 2175? Sorry; I looked at my chart wrong. It does go 2175 then 2179-2182. I misread it to be 2178 thru 2182. But you'll notice I called it a 2175 when giving the CPW factors later. (Trying to save face here...) >> Which model 620 did you get, and why? > >It is a 2175 and If I remember correctly, it was because of the number of >twinax devices we support. In any case the 170 had limits which were >outside our tolerance. As I said, there can be legitimate reasons. And your company has evidently had explosive growth if you went from a 200/2031 to a 620, so it the trend is projected to continue it gives additional reason to be in the 6xx or 7xx series. I wasn't necessarily trying to argue you should have gotten a 170, just making sure all the options were considered before changing tiers. It is unusual (in my experience), but certainly justifiable when growth exceeds the increase within the current tier. >>The question is why didn't your rep/BP go >> over all the ramifications when deciding what you should upgrade to? > >The question in regard to my BP could have been asked for every purchase I >have ever made. :) > >OK look, it may be that we do things which are unusual. Maybe I am reading >this wrong, but according to what I have read above, you apparently think I >am simply stupid. No, you're reading it wrong. I didn't intend to imply you are simply stupid. I would consider it to be the responsibility of the BP to present all the costs -- not of the customer to ask! I'd be very displeased with the BP in a situation like this. You asked them for a quote, and they should have known you had a support line contract. This was there omission as far as I'm concerned. I certainly wasn't trying to flame you. >I guess I don't understand the direction you are taking this. Well, to be honest, it started out when I thought you were talking about software subscription costs, not support line. I guess it was the subject heading you replied under, and the fact the monthly figures are in the ballpark of P10 to P20 costs for SS. I had entered most of the response before I realized you were talking about support line instead of software subscription. >You ignored my primary questions, which you cut out of your reply. > >*_Which one is right?_* > >*_Will I soon get hit with another retroactive bill?_* > >So, I ask again, which quoted price is right? $463/mo or $116/mo (it's >multiple choice ;) I ignored it because when I checked the configurator I have, I realized it would give me software subscription prices but not support line charges. IOW, I went to look it up but found I would have to do a web search to get current prices. But the support line charges vary with the machine, so I would anticipate an increase when going from P10 to P20. However I don't have a copy of the options since it is not in the (public) configurator. That's why I didn't answer the question directly. So I just searched on the web, and the newest thing I could find was announcement letter 699-026 from last June 15. (Which is at http://www.ibmlink.ibm.com/usalets&parms=H_699-026 ) But it doesn't give the charges and instead just says: "For pricing information regarding any of the services listed in this announcement, contact your IBM representative, your IBM Business Partner, or call 800-IBM-4YOU (426-4968), or IBM Global Services Inside Sales at 888-426-4343. " However, I also found price changes from 1998 in letter 398-023 which should give you an approximation of the charges. An excerpt follows: Support Family Services Prime Prime Full Full Shift Shift Shift Shift Old New Old New Charge Charge Charge Charge AS/400 Standard Support Line 9401-P01,2,3 $ 105 $ 116 $ 142 $ 157 9402-200,20S 105 116 142 157 9406-320 $515 $567 $695 $765 9406-500,50S 240 264 324 357 9406-510 405 446 547 602 9406-S20,600 120 132 163 180 9406-620 453 499 612 674 Switch to a fixed-pitch font to be more readable. But the 200/2031 went from $105 to $116 effective April 1, 1998 for prime shift coverage. At the same time, the 620 went from $453 to $499 per month. Contracts renewed after July 1, 1998, were affected by the letter too. But that is two years old now, and is the newest specific charges I can find on IBM's web site. You can see the letter at http://www.ibmlink.ibm.com/usalets&parms=H_398-023 Judging from the above letter, I'd say the $463 should be much closer to the current price for a 620 than $116 per month. Hopefully IBM will honor your new contract at $116, and you signed a long-term agreement. :) Doug +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.