Re: QBASE - QCTL

[email@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (James W Kilgore)]

Erik,

Given enough memory, the -need- to manage it disappears.
Maybe that's why there is no right or wrong answer.

One can always start with QBASE and change it when the need arises.

"E.Jahn" wrote:
> 
> Hello all,
> I would like to ask for your opinion about controlling subsystems - which is
> better to use. Even guys from IBM couldn't give me clear answer.
> I definitely prefer QCTL but no one was able to explain me why use QBASE
> except simplicity (simplicity without possibility :)  ).
> I work on AS/400 5 years and always use QCTL on every machine. My opinion is
> that you have larger scale of possibilities how to configure your system.
>
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---