× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. February 2000

QBASE - QCTL

  • Subject: QBASE - QCTL
  • From: "E.Jahn" <erik.jahn@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 10:55:40 +0100
 
Hello all,
I would like to ask for your opinion about controlling subsystems - which is
better to use. Even guys from IBM couldn't give me clear answer.
I definitely prefer QCTL but no one was able to explain me why use QBASE
except simplicity (simplicity without possibility :)  ).
I work on AS/400 5 years and always use QCTL on every machine. My opinion is
that you have larger scale of possibilities how to configure your system.

TIA,

Erik

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.