|
Joe, This would probably be better served on the consulting forum, but as it impacts full-timers as well, here goes RANT MODE(*ON): In a message dated 1/26/00 7:52:46 AM Eastern Standard Time, joeteff@earthlink.net writes: > A few months ago, there was a thread that discussed the lack of work > in the AS/400 consulting marketplace. I've noticed this since last > summer. As consultants came off of contracts, fewer and fewer were > being placed again. This got really bad in the 4th quarter. There were > many reports of consultants leaving the consulting business or even > being laif off. So far January doesn't seem to be reversing this trend. > I think it's due, at least in part, because of the former consultants > taking full time positions, thus reducing the need for consultants. I'd > be interested in hearing from others on thier thoughts, concerns and > expectations on this. The market last summer was bad, _REALLY_ bad, for consultants. January has not been much better, but then again, it never is. Plans are being made, budgets are being finalized, and there's just not that much going on. My whole _COAST_ is shut down due to snow right now! Number one, consultants that didn't deserve them had jobs due to Y2K. Guess what? It's _OVER_! Poor consultants and those that got in it "for the money" aren't being asked back, and I say good riddance. Those in "the private sector" that moan about how much money we make consulting have never checked into paying their own expenses, training, doubling their FICA here in the US, usurious business taxes, paying 100% of their own insurance, planning their own retirement, or saving enough money to "ride it out" when things get bad. This is _NOT_ a business for the faint of heart or the ignorant of money management. Consulting is not a job to take while you're finding a job, nor is it the "cash cow" that most imagine. If you're griping about the hours you work in a full time position, try being considered practically slave labor and forced to perform the duties that "regular" employees won't "because you get overtime". Those getting out of consulting because of the current _ANNUAL_ (not _MILLENIAL_) downturn either shouldn't have gotten into it in the first place or should have delayed that BMW purchase until they had at least three months' salary and expenses (including estimated tax payments in the US) built up. In this economy, former consultants taking full-time positions shouldn't have been consultants in the first place, IMO. They're not eliminating jobs for us, just creating _MORE_ once their new employers figure out how much work they're _REALLY_ doing. Packaged software with custom development tools presents a problem if the client declines to purchase those tools and subcontract to the vendor, but vendor contracts are available to good consultants -- you just have to be able to stand fast on your rate. But why bother with kludgy corporations remiss in remittance? In my case, why would a client pay $1,600+ per day plus expenses for BPCS work to SSA when they can pay a one-time fee for the tools and have me for less? I _average_ three more years' experience with the development tools and the product than most people SSA sends out! Why pay IBM's "Global Services" big bucks to tune your machine, when I've been doing the same thing for less since many of _their_ people were in elementary school? Some companies just hire based on names, but many more do not. If they want to trade on longevity, I've been in business longer than most of the ".COM's" in their stock portfolio and have consistently shown a better profit ;-)! I don't think that asking for a long-term contract should necessarily automatically disqualify someone from consideration for a consulting position. Us "little guys" would simply prefer to keep the marketing to a minimum, but most are more than willing to work a couple of weeks in an interesting assignment. However, anyone that expects to automatically "extend" at the end of that contract _IS_ just looking for a job and needs to find one. Which leads me to my final point. This is a quote from me, rather than my usual sources: "The difference between a consultant and a contractor is that a consultant's job is to ultimately eliminate the need for their position, a contractor's job is to perpetuate that need." I spent nearly four years in one place because they couldn't keep talented staff, and the staff that stayed was either new or incapable of learning what I was trying to teach them. The smart ones left with their knowledge once I passed it on to them because the client didn't pay well, was in a bad location, and had lousy benefits -- the ones with "ten years of AS/400 experience" yet still didn't understand positional parameters stayed. Not ten years, the same year ten times. Said client _FINALLY_ reviewed their IS salary policies, promoted a few folks on my recommendation (and some not), and hung on to a core group of employees long enough to let me go. In closing (ooooooh, just heard a big _YAY_! on the surround-sound), consultants can provide an invaluable service to your company _IN THE SHORT TERM_. Don't let one bad experience turn you off forever. Small accounts are more vulnerable to those of us that are "fast talkers" and charge a low rate only to work on other client's projects using your machine while charging BOTH you AND them, but that ain't all of us. Heck, I specialize in large clients and have watched some of my so-called "peers" being hauled off by the police at more than one -- that didn't mean that the client threw the rest of us out. Sometimes you get what you pay for, sometimes you don't. More often though, you do... RANT MODE(*OFF) JMHO, Dean Asmussen Enterprise Systems Consulting, Inc. Fuquay-Varina, NC USA E-mail: DAsmussen@aol.com "A friend is a lot of things, but a critic he isn't." -- Bern Williams +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.