• Subject: Re: Temporary Addresses - What causes them to be used up?
  • From: Larry Bolhuis <lbolhui@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 16:28:58 -0500
  • Organization: Arbor Solutions, Inc

> > That is what they said about 640K and Dos, And 2 to the 48th on the
> > SYS/38 :)

Yes they did but look at the numbers.  The first IBM PC (with PC1 MB) had a 16K
RAM base which was already 2.5% of the 640K architected max.  Even that board
which was soon replaced with one that held 4 times as much, could hold 10% of 
max.   Now doesn't it seem that the claim that 'nobody would need more than 
when the system base was already 2.5% was a little weak?

Contrast that with the 64 bit number: 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 of which the
AS/400's current MAXIMUM DASD (Not memory) is a mere 0.0000216%!! That's a 
significant difference I'd think!

 - Larry

Larry Bolhuis         |         What if it's True?
Arbor Solutions, Inc  |
(616) 451-2500        |  
(616) 451-2571 -fax   | 
lbolhui@ibm.net       |
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].