|
Don wrote: >Pardon my ignorance, but how does this differ from having all open >applications "maximized" and using the ALT-TAB key sequence to switch >between them? > >I can't say I'm overly enamored of Windows, but it does provide the ability >to open as many copies of your softcopy manuals as you want and switch >between them at will. I can't say I see much difference between this and >having multiple printed books open on my desk. Except, of course, the >printed books take up gobs of space. It's hard to visualize the usefulness of multiple virtual desktops in X without actually trying it. Here's a more substantial example from my own experience: I've played with a Java application involving a number of packages. In each of 3 or 4 virtual windows, I've had a folder view of the files in the package, several editors opened to source files in that package, and a command line session. In yet another virtual window, I've had at least two browsers open to the Java on-line documentation. I can switch between different packages or to the docs by clicking on buttons at the bottom of the screen. Another scenario: I can have web browsing and e-mail on one session, web page maintenance on another, web image editing on a third, and some games on a fourth (to occupy me while waiting on a large download). Each session has multiple related apps open and I don't have to clutter up one session or minimize windows to work effectively. The difference is that you can organize your work more effectively. Each virtual desktop can contains a set of related things. On the other hand, the MS-Windows approach seems designed to minimize the number of open windows. OS/2 and X are better in that one mouse button click will bring up a list of open applications. With MS-Windows, you have this silly task bar at the bottom. With more than a few apps, the text is truncated so much, you really don't know which app is which. (Since I've heard so much about the instability of Win95 with multiple apps open, I'm sure this was a conscious design decision to try to encourage users to keep the number of open apps down. Unfortunately, although WNT is much more stable, its users are now stuck with this horrid design too!) Another advantage of multiple virtual desktops is that now desktop icons become useful again! The big problem with desktop icons is that when you have lots of windows open, they get obscured very quickly. On X, you switch to an unused virtual desktop, and all the desktop icons are usable again! Cheers! Hans Hans Boldt, ILE RPG Development, IBM Toronto Lab, boldt@ca.ibm.com +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.