|
Bob, Did you or your company sign a license agreement? If so, that is the model you have to work with. It doesn't matter if you "agree" with the model being used....somebody signed the agreement which means they agreed. If not, then you probably aren't supposed to be using the software at all. And many packages use the model you are talking about...which is "how many times is it being used right now". And it is a valid model (but not the one Cornerstone uses). If that is the model your vendor is using, then you are violating the license agreement (read: contract) by subverting it. You might get away with it right now. But what happens if they find out? Perhaps they are lurking on Midrange-L? When they find out, they can of course sue you. Or, deny any form of support. Then what happens when you get a new AS/400 and the package doesn't work? Or a Y2K bug is found? Or a new version of OS/400 breaks the software you are using? Or..... Cheating/stealing now will bite you and/or your company down the road. Regards, Bob Crothers Cornerstone Communications, LLC -----Original Message----- From: Bob Randall [SMTP:BLR@airxcel.com] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 1999 3:47 PM To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com Subject: RE: Release License API Ethics Thanks to all for the replies. ;-) No, I will not hold anyone legally responsible. ;-) I was a little concerned about the "moral" issue. I think I have a legal right to delete users and add the new ones as needed, but to do this "automatically" seemed to be skirting around in legalities (what is the meaning of is? <ha-ha>). I disagree with my software vendor about their licensing practices, and the definition of concurrent. They seem to think concurrent means I use a license for each emulation session I start. I tend to think as long as I use one sign on, one PC, one AS/400, one line, it is one use, regardless of the number of windows. But that is another issue. Thanks again, Moral Bob > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com > [mailto:owner-midrange-l@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Jim Langston > Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 1999 12:39 PM > To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com > Subject: Re: Release License API Ethics > > > Oh, oh, oh! Now it makes MUCH more sense 8-) > <big snip> > +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +--- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.