|
I had no intention of dissing the work you guys are doing, believe me. Its just that I have had my eyes opened regarding client/server. Yes, there are some really great ways of handling problems, the applications look nice, the users love them, and user training is a fraction of green screen trianing costs. But client/server is not cheap, nor is it fast. Just keeping everyone on the same version & level is a chore in itself. Add to that the roll-out process and the problems all begin to add up in more staff and more hardware. My only point was, and continues to be, that there are features we can offer to green-screen shops. Many shops have terminals and will for the foreseeable future. But they can have colors, a mouse, and a few appearance improvements. Please respond to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com Sent by: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com To: "'MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com'" <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com> cc: Subject: RE: ok, I made a green screen with radio buttons Three full-timers, a total of two person-years (how's THAT for politically correct!?). But believe-you-me, this is NOT a small or simple application. HOWEVER, let me state emphatically that from a BUSINESS point-of-view, I can see NO reason why this was developed for Windows versus 5250. Seriously. Then again, I VERY SELDOM see good BUSINESS reasons for GUI's. My constant comment/joke during the development of this application has been, "Can I interest you in green screen RPG?". My point, however, was that this type of thing is VERY "doable". Plus, the UML tools and class builders ARE nice and DO make development go VERY fast. Peace, -- Don -----Original Message----- From: boothm@earth.goddard.edu [mailto:boothm@earth.goddard.edu] Sent: Friday, November 05, 1999 8:21 AM To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com Subject: RE: ok, I made a green screen with radio buttons How big is the staff doing this Don? Is there more than you and a part-time helper involved? I'm asking in seriousness because what you've described (aside from the FDA and CFR stuff) is work for a mid-level RPG programmer for what? maybe 6 months? Please respond to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com Sent by: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com To: "'MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com'" <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com> cc: Subject: RE: ok, I made a green screen with radio buttons Sir -- We are currently deploying a three-tier client/server application. This application will support 150 users. The database is SQL Server 7.0. We are using MTS. We are using VB 6.0. This is a VERY critical line-of-business application. The software must meet government (FDA) standards and is validated. We are implementing CFR Part 11 Electronic Records/Electronic Signatures. It's here. It's now. It's working. HOW difficult is that? I don't get it. And my brother went to Goddard for a year or two, so I KNOW you're smart. -- Don -----Original Message----- From: boothm@earth.goddard.edu [mailto:boothm@earth.goddard.edu] Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 1999 8:05 PM To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com Subject: Re: ok, I made a green screen with radio buttons John, your points are valid and I accept them for that. Getting excited over radio buttons is difficult. On the other hand I've spent two years getting myself up to speed on the client/server solution amd the full GUI pallet that you lay out as the goal, and my reaction is... GUI ain't ready for prime time yet. The client/server paradigm is difficult to install, difficult to keep in synch, dreadfully expensive to develop, more expensive to deploy, and not yet very fault-tolerant. I've yet to see really good GUI applications devoted to the businesss model, beyond typical office secretarial services. Until GUI really is deployable then it looks to me like business will be done on text-based screens. Even the e-business web applications I've seen are essentially text-based at this point. Please respond to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com Sent by: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com To: <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com> cc: Subject: Re: ok, I made a green screen with radio buttons Booth, Maybe some of us are having trouble getting too excited because a few clunky radio buttons on a 80 or 132 column screen does not a GUI make. I'd be hard pressed to believe that (as currently implemented) they make an application any easier to use, and they certainly don't give a tired old terminal a sexy new look. These things are an answer to a problem that doesn't exist. My users aren't asking for radio buttons and menu bars on a terminal screen. What are they asking for? They are asking for a GUI - a complete GUI. One that provides the following features: 1) Colour - Lots of it, used intelligently to draw attention to different information. 2) More data for each screen. Eighty columns doesn't cut it. And just try to effectively use 132 columns displays in a CA/400 emulation session - it looks horrible. 3) Rich text fields that allow them to emphasize their text. And on, and on, and on.... limited time prevents me from continuing. But these few examples should serve to illustrate some of the elements of a GUI that actually help the user in any significant way. Radio boxes, menu bars etc., are nice touches, but they don't allow you to really do anything that you can't already accomplish using existing techniques. Solving any of these problems would require significant resources, and I don't think that I would like to see IBM wasting any more time on it. I think that they should continue to focus on the more modern tools instead. Regards, John Taylor +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +--- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +--- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.