[snip] > >On our 9406-510, I found the autotuner to be essentially worthless. We had > >to monitor the various stats and make adjustments over time, as you > >suggest. The situation on the 310 was the same. > > > Yes, and Version 3 of the tuner was so-so. On large machines with big mixes, > it did not work well. > > > >Then we migrated to the 9406-720. My IBM var told me that autotuner worked > >well, so I turned it on. > > > >It has worked so well that I've set virtually everything to *CALC and > >simply let the system mangage itself > > > > > And with Version 4 (V4R2 and up) the tuner is really something useful. > My apologies! I neglected to mention that we are at V4R3. The tuner definitely does the job. +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: firstname.lastname@example.org +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.