RE: SYSTEM TUNING

["Christopher J. Devous" <cdevous@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

[snip]
> >On our 9406-510, I found the autotuner to be essentially worthless.  We had
> >to monitor the various stats and make adjustments over time, as you
> >suggest.  The situation on the 310 was the same.
> >
> Yes, and Version 3 of the tuner was so-so. On large machines with big mixes,
> it did not work well.
> 
> 
> >Then we migrated to the 9406-720.  My IBM var told me that autotuner worked
> >well, so I turned it on.
> >
> >It has worked so well  that I've set virtually everything to *CALC and
> >simply let the system mangage itself
> >
> 
> 
> And with Version 4 (V4R2 and up) the tuner is really something useful.
> 

My apologies!  I neglected to mention that we are at V4R3.  The tuner 
definitely does the job.
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---