RE: CL improvements

Very true. In my days as an as/400 op, we were constantly writing CL
utilities to automate almost every function, 
so that we could spend more time sleeping(joke) 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: John P Carr [mailto:jpcarr@tredegar.com]
>Sent: Monday, October 11, 1999 6:51 PM
>To: MIDRANGE-L
>Subject: RE: CL improvements
>
>
>
>
>
>>Forgive me for being a killjoy here, but do we REALLY NEED 
>these sort of
>>enhancements in CL? Subroutines? FOR loops? I'd much rather 
>IBM focused
>>its' efforts elsewhere. 
>
>Forgive me Tim,  but to the majority of the System Operators, 
>and Systems
>Programmers, CL is still the only Procedual Control Language 
>for doing the
>mundane things like Saving Libraries,  other system type 
>functions to be
>done in batch,  maybe as Subsystem Jobs,  Prestart Jobs,  IPL 
>start up type
>jobs,  etc.    These people will never learn a HLL nor should 
>they really
>need to.
>
>This language is NOT primarily for Application Programmers,   
>Its for the
>Operation Staff.
>
>Try running a shop with out CL.     
>
>IMHO.
>
>John Carr
>
>+---
>| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
>| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
>| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
>| To unsubscribe from this list send email to 
>MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
>| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: 
>david@midrange.com
>+---
>
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---