|
> Our preference would be Client Access - > I am unclear of the IBM licensing issues with regards > to this option; not to mention the thing that concerns us the most > is the security issues with regards to being able to do file uploads > and downloads. I ask IBM directly the other day what, if any, CA/400 licensing issues exist if an organization wants to deploy CA/400 on desktops of non-employee users. IBM's answer was that as long as the distribution keeps you within your licensed number of CA/400 seats, "we don't care how widely our customers distribute our Client Access code." rp +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.