> Our preference would be Client Access -
> I am unclear of the IBM licensing issues with regards
> to this option; not to mention the thing that concerns us the most
> is the security issues with regards to being able to do file uploads
> and downloads.
I ask IBM directly the other day what, if any, CA/400 licensing issues exist
if an organization wants to deploy CA/400 on desktops of non-employee users.
IBM's answer was that as long as the distribution keeps you within your
licensed number of CA/400 seats, "we don't care how widely our customers
distribute our Client Access code."
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: firstname.lastname@example.org
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact