× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Richard Baird wrote:
> 
> hey all,
> 
> I've got a question I hope one of you can help me with.
> 
> If you have an advanced S/36 running both S/36-SSP and OS/400, can the
> s/36 programs, running under SSP access native DB2/400 files?

Yes... using DDM

You don't need a Advanced S/36 anymore, ANY risc 400 can run dual
systems..
> 
> The reason I'm asking is that I've got a customer who has a perfectly
> good system written in rpgII and ocl via SSP only, running on a 236,
> that does exactly what they want it to do.  We'd like upgrade them to a
> dual OS 436 to convert and externalize their database, so that new

You can do that, but all external files will be on the OS/400 "side"..
and will be accessed using DDM.

> developement would be easier, and could be written in more "modern"
> languages, without having to convert the entire s36 system (especially
> the ocl :)

OCl can be a problem to convert, since it's operational methods don't
make the most effective use of the AS/400...
> 
> Running in S/36 environement is an option, but not a very good one.  I
> would like to continue using SSP.

Running in the S/36EE is an excellent way to take the customers over
in a gradual approach.. From a performance standpoint, you lose some
things, but not enough to really hurt you... MOST programs and OCL will
run without ANY changes, but there are performance considerations that
will improve the run times 1000%, which are VERY minor changes. What are
your concerns about the S/36ee ?? Using the S/36ee allows you to use ALL
OS/400 options and MOST S/36 features... There really isn't a "down"
side
to this approach...

If you "must" keep SSP, that will work also, but the administration gets
a little tougher keeping all the operational aspects of two different
systems in "sync". Not difficult, just more work..
 
> > Has anyone out there done this sort of thing?

Yes.... several times.... using "both" methods..
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.