×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Joe the equation basically begins with divide by 400
IF no remainder STOP = Leap Year
Since 2000 divides evenly by 4 your current leap year
divide by 4 routines should still work. Unless you were
doing some xx00 testing before <??>
At 11:25 AM 9/29/99 -0500, you wrote:
>I thought the leap year rule stated that any year evenly divisible
>by 4 was a leap year unless it was also evenly divisible by 400
>and then it wasn't. That would make 1700, 1800 and 1900 leap
>years, but 2000 wouldn't be. Yet everywhere I look, it shows a
>Feb 29th in 2000 (calendars, PIM software, OS/400 date data
>types, etc). I seem remember a thread on this list a while back
>and it was stated that 2000 wasn't a leap year. Can anyone set
>me straight here.
>
>Joe Teff
>
+--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
