• Subject: RE: Feb 29, 2000
  • From: Lurton Keel <Lurton.Keel@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 13:08:24 -0500

Century ending years divisible, evenly by 400 are leap years.  
1700-1800-1900-2100 weren't/won't be leap years.

                -----Original Message-----
                From:   Joe Teff [mailto:jteff19@idt.net]
                Sent:   Wednesday, September 29, 1999 11:25 AM
                To:     Midrange Dot Com
                Subject:        Feb 29, 2000

                I thought the leap year rule stated that any year evenly
divisible
                by 4 was a leap year unless it was also evenly divisible by
400
                and then it wasn't. That would make 1700, 1800 and 1900 leap
                years, but 2000 wouldn't be. Yet everywhere I look, it shows
a
                Feb 29th in 2000 (calendars, PIM software, OS/400 date data
                types, etc). I seem remember a thread on this list a while
back
                and it was stated that 2000 wasn't a leap year. Can anyone
set
                me straight here.
                
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].