RE: Firewall & proxy server

["Neil Palmer" <neilp@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Bob,

Yeah - I should have qualified that  "at least a one step processor upgrade
to run native Domino."
comment.  It's a generalisation, but you often see people trying to install
it on their present machine, which is usually almost maxed out with it's
current workload.  Isn't that how most of us run our systems ?  :-)
Of course if you had a larger enough processor/memory combination and your
CPU utilisation wasn't reaching the limits you should be OK.

 Neil Palmer         DPS Data Processing Services Canada Ltd.
                                             AS/400~~~~~
Markham,  Ontario,   Canada    ___________          ___  ~
Phone: (905) 474-4890  x303   |OOOOOOOOOO| ________  o|__||=
Cell.: (416) 565-1682  x303   |__________|_|______|_|______)
Fax:   (905) 474-4898          oo      oo   oo  oo   OOOo=o\
mailto:NeilP@DPSlink.com    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.DPSlink.com        AS/400  The Ultimate Business Server





"Bob Randall" <BLR@Airxcel.com> on 99-07-15 09:34:02

Please respond to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com

To:   MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
cc:    (bcc: Neil Palmer/Dpslink)

Subject:  RE: Firewall & proxy server




Neil,
You nailed it, I have a 2175 with 128MB. I had the similar thoughts about
sizing from the response Glen gave me, but I don't really understand the
batch/interactive balancing. Anyway, I think I am going to have to unload
Domino to another machine. That other machine might not be another AS/400
since I may have an RS/6000 in the wings from another division. I should
have done my research on Domino, you are the first I -heard- say "at at
least a one step processor upgrade to run native Domino."
Thanks for the info,
Bob
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com
> [mailto:owner-midrange-l@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Neil Palmer
> Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 1999 5:05 PM
> To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> Subject: Re: Firewall & proxy server
>
>
>
>
> Glenn - it's your batch CPW that matters for HTTP, SMTP, POP etc, not
> Interactive CPW.
> You have a batch CPW of 125.  Bob doesn't say what model of 620
> he has, but
> a 620 is not a server model (with the higher batch performance, and a
> penalty for running too much interactive work).  So Bob's CPW for all
work
> is one of the following:
> 2175  50.0
> big snip <



+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---