• Subject: Re: Recursive Calls--what I use
  • From: "Dennis Lovelady" <dennis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 17:13:54 -0500

Hi, Tim:

From: Tim McCarthy <TimM@softwarejungle.com>
Sent: July 9, 1999 4:24 PM


> Yes but:  ((new_solution = overhead++) &&
> !(get_rid_of_joblog_exceptions));
> An MI program that uses the MATINVS is cleaner and much faster.

Agreed 100%... but it won't run anymore at level 40 security (worked fine
at 4.1, I believe, but not at 4.3).  Of if it will, I sure didn't figure
out how yet.  Got a working example that proves me wrong?
--
Dennis Lovelady                    Fayetteville, GA
mail: dennis@lovelady.com          dennis.e.lovelady@ac.com
URL:  http://lovelady.piedmont.net
ICQ:  5734860
--
"I am returning this otherwise good typing paper to you because someone
has printed gibberish all over it and put your name at the top.
        - English Professor, Ohio University


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].