RE: NT v AS400 -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

The numbers I saw recently were 5 hours per year for the AS/400-OS/400
(single processor) unplanned outages while the Intel-Windows NT was 220+
hours per year.  The AS/400 was the highest rated single processor only
trailing the Sysplex and Tandem multi-processor systems.


                -----Original Message-----
                From:   Allen, Stuart [mailto:sallen@fellowes.com]
                Sent:   Monday, May 17, 1999 5:23 AM
                To:     'MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com'
                Subject:        NT v AS400

                Anyone got any attributable figures for NT unplanned outages
vs AS400
                unplanned outages to hand?
                
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.