Re: CF -Specs (was: "x-Spec") -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Evan Harris <spanner@ihug.co.nz> wrote:

>Sure you can scan for x++ more easily, but does that make for better code ?
>
>I actually meant implied in the sense that it is not explicitly coded.
>
>Why exactly would it be nice to have other than for scanning source code.
>What does it *really Add* to the language ?

You could call it RPG++. Now that's almost as cool as a talking frog. Certainly
it's better than "Rippling Pecs & Glutes", or whatever. :-)

Dave Kahn, ABB Steward Ltd.


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.