RE: IBM pushing Java

["Stone, Brad V (PP)" <bvstone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Crosby [mailto:jlcrosby@fwi.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 22, 1999 12:01 PM
> To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> Subject: Re: IBM pushing Java
> 
> 
> Colin Williams wrote:
>  
> > I here what your saying, but I've worked at sites before 
> where they are
> > so busy fighting fires, that updating of the documentation 
> falls by the
> > wayside!!
> 
> And the other side of that is the assumption that just because
> documentation exists, that it will actually be read.
> 

And one step further, that the documentation acutally means something or is
residual garbage comments from a previous version.

If java is so "good" that would mean that it's "self-documenting".  I've
played with JavaScript (which I'm guessing is similar to Java) and I have to
admit it is fun and "self-documenting".  I was able to "guess" attributes
(ie this.name, this.value, etc) after getting the basic jist of the
language.

Even RPG is, to a point.  There are some commenting habits that drive me up
a wall and are deleted right away... ie

C*   If the customer number = 99999 then add one to the counter
C                       if              (CustNo = 99999)
C                 eval          Counter = (Counter + 1)
C                 endif

If you can't read the code (I would wager than at least 85% of all code is
"readable" to a point), then you probably shouldn't be programming.
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---