× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Timeslice/purge settings was: Suppress Query Status Message
  • From: Buck Calabro/commsoft<mcalabro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 09:26:24 -0500

On 03/17/99 05:46:43 PM pytel wrote:

Alexey,

>Timeslice and Purge settings will not have any noticable influence on
>long-running tasks.

This is a very interesting topic!
Doesn't TIMESLICE come into play when you have a compute-bound job? 
Something like creating large GDDM graphics?  When the job goes to disk to 
get/put a record, it leaves the activity level, right?  Unless the job 
occupies the activity level until timeslice end, boosting the timeslice 
makes no difference

The purge setting is mostly useful in a small-memory system, if I recall. 
It lets you tell the system if you want the entire PAG paged in one 
operation at timeslice end/enter long wait.

This leaves RUNPTY as the other parameter on the class.  Won't a job that 
fetches thousands of pages of DASD at RUNPTY(20) will be more of a resource 
hog than the same job running at 50?  It'll certainly get returned to an 
activity level before the RUNPTY(50) job will.

So, I guess the question here is: for a query, does the processor time 
required to build an access path get charged to the interactive job, or to 
an internal system task?

The batch/interactive debate extends into separate memory pools and working 
set size.  Too often, the interactive memory pool is sized for a smaller 
working set that the batch pools.  This makes it easier for a batch-type 
job to force other jobs' storage to be paged out.  This is not a Good Thing 
for the interactive job's program pages that've been paged out by DB pages.

>Suppressing status messages can help, because sending message to display
>device incurs a relatively high overhead (especially when there are many).

Absolutely!  The same is true for writing messages to the job log.  Any 
time a program/job does extra I/O is a place to look for performance 
improvements.

Buck Calabro
Billing Concepts Inc (formerly CommSoft), Albany, NY
mailto:mcalabro@commsoft.net
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.