|
"Emilio Padilla" <vpadilla@guate.net> wrote: >I don't think that your performance problem has anything to do >with the message, do you have a AS/400 server by any chance?, >This message shouldn't cause any performance problem. I would have said exactly the same, but I just did a few quick tests and there did seem to be a marked difference in performance with the messages on of off. I'd still be surprised if it made the difference between 2 minutes and 5 minutes. It could possibly be related to general system tuning between the batch and interactive pools given their actual workload. As an aside, if I had a 2 minute batch OPNQRYF I'd be very reluctant to run that interactively in a production environment. Joe, some feedback on your results would be welcome. Dave Kahn, ABB Steward Ltd. +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.