× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: SNADS over TCP/IP
  • From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 13:31:34 -0500

I agree that, in my experience, that FTP is faster.  However let me bring up 
one application 
in which I prefer snads.  We have multiple AS/400's.  To send EDI data from one 
AS/400 to another 
we use snads to send to someone named EDIxxxxx on the particular machine.  For 
example EDI00001 
on SYSTEMA.  SYSTEMA will have a never ending program that will process the 
data upon receipt by
doing a RCVNETF with a MONMSG.  If SYSTEMA is running period end, or restricted 
backups then it 
kills the never ending job and starts it again when it is ready.  If SYSTEMA is 
down due to the 
above reasons, maintenance or whatever then SYSTEMB doesn't give a rip.  To set 
up this same 
processing via FTP would require jumping through many more hoops.

Rob Berendt




TimM@softwarejungle.com on 03/03/99 12:03:53 PM
Please respond to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com@Internet
To:     MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com@Internet
cc:      

Subject:        RE: SNADS over TCP/IP



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken & Gloria Cox [SMTP:kgc@swbell.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 1999 12:15 AM
> To:   MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> Subject:      RE: SNADS over TCP/IP
> 
        >I agree. Snads is outdated. FTP is the protocol of the future.

        Hmmm, SNADS outdated? May I respectfully suggest you make a
closer technical comparison between these two utilities. If you're
referring simply to SNADS file transfer capabilities (never mind the
other SERVICES that SNADS offers) I can think of several reasons why
SNADS is superior...queuing, storing, reliability. True FTP is more
universally available but...SNADS outdated?
          


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.