RE: SNADS over TCP/IP -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken & Gloria Cox [SMTP:kgc@swbell.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 1999 12:15 AM
> To:   MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> Subject:      RE: SNADS over TCP/IP
> 
        >I agree. Snads is outdated. FTP is the protocol of the future.

        Hmmm, SNADS outdated? May I respectfully suggest you make a
closer technical comparison between these two utilities. If you're
referring simply to SNADS file transfer capabilities (never mind the
other SERVICES that SNADS offers) I can think of several reasons why
SNADS is superior...queuing, storing, reliability. True FTP is more
universally available but...SNADS outdated?
          


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.