Re: CA/400 TCP/IP More than 1 session

[bclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Bob Clark)]

I'm not sure I understand.  Why SHOULD IBM care about this "limitation"?  I 
think
the concept is simple.  You only want a user to have one session available to
them, so you give it a specific name.  If you have a user who needs multiple
sessions to perform their job, you create multiple sessions.  I have users here
that would try to open 10 sessions if we let them.

Roger Pence wrote:

> >With TCP/IP, only the first session comes up and the other sessions are
> >blank.  It is trying to start a session with the exact same name.  To
> >get around this, we have to create an icon for each session, each
> >specifying the session name.
> >
> >Are we doing something wrong here?
>
> Nope. That's known limitation that Rochester has seemed to not care much
> about.
>
> rp
>
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
> +---
begin:vcard 
n:Clark;Bob
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:US Safety
adr:;;;Lenexa;Ks;66214;USA
version:2.1
email;internet:bclark@ussafety.com
title:Programmer/Analyst
tel;fax:913-599-1703
tel;work:913-599-5555 x274
x-mozilla-cpt:;0
fn:Bob Clark
end:vcard