|
At 00:34 01/05/1999 -0500, Booth Martin wrote: >Pete, what does "not scale very well" mean? Are we to think of one or two >users, or 8, or 15, or 3,000? I've got 30 or so users running against a read-only Access database with no problems, however, if several (meaning 2 or more) open it for update, they have problems with lock conflicts because it seems to use a disk sector locking algorithm. There is also little in the way of security. It's an all or nothing proposition. Nothing at even at the table level. It doesn't do triggers either, although it does handle constraints fairly well. I can't comment on what happens if you have a large table. You do need to compress the database regularly. I've had trouble with databases becoming corrupt while doing automated compress operations. SQL Anywhere is a lot better for not much more money. Pete Hall peteh@inwave.com http://www.inwave.com/~peteh +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.