At 00:34 01/05/1999 -0500, Booth Martin wrote:
>Pete, what does "not scale very well" mean?  Are we to think of one or two 
>users, or 8, or 15, or 3,000?

I've got 30 or so users running against a read-only Access database with no
problems, however, if several (meaning 2 or more) open it for update, they
have problems with lock conflicts because it seems to use a disk sector
locking algorithm. There is also little in the way of security. It's an all
or nothing proposition. Nothing at even at the table level. It doesn't do
triggers either, although it does handle constraints fairly well. I can't
comment on what happens if you have a large table. You do need to compress
the database regularly. I've had trouble with databases becoming corrupt
while doing automated compress operations. SQL Anywhere is a lot better for
not much more money.
Pete Hall
peteh@inwave.com
http://www.inwave.com/~peteh
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].