|
Venu - I don't understand - why are you writing a data aging program anyway? There a several good ones on the market that might save you the development time and testing? Glenn __________________________________________ Glenn Ericson, Phoenix Consulting P O Box 701164 East Elmhurst NY 11370-3164 USA Phone 718 898 9805 Fax 718 446 1150 AS/400 & Year 2000- - Solutions Specialists © 1998 copyright, all rights reserved ___________________________________________ At 03:18 PM 9/28/98 -0400, you wrote: >Hi All, > >Recently we wrote a DateAging application. The application uses multi >threading. Each data file in the user library is aged simultaneously as >independeng aging jobs. We used this to enhancethe performance. Earlier version >was only single thread where the application used to age one datafile at a >time. Although we gained a lot of improvement with the new design, we still are >facing some difficulties particularly with files of bigger size. > >We have this application written in ILE and we are having different modules to >do different tasks, we have service pgms, binding directories...all that stuff. >We have compiles the main program as > >CRTBNDRPG with OPTIMIZE(*BASIC). > >We are still facing some performance problems. A data file of 1 million records >is taking more than 15 hrs to complete the job. Is there anything to do with >this OPTIMIZE(*BASIC). I read in the ILE manuals that there will be significant >improvements if we change this to OPTIMIZE(*FULL). But I dont know what >improvements it is referring. The majority of time is wasted in the I/O of the >datafile. How is this OPTIMIZE parameter going to influence the data file I/O?? >The manual says that there will be significant improvements with >OPTIMIZE(*FULL) but there will be some problems also. What are these >difficulties?? > >We are also thinking of chaning the record blocking factor for the data file. >That is, before calling our RPG program, we will do a OVRDBF of the datafile >with NBRRCDS as say 10000. Will there be any improvements and what are the >possible problems we will face if we change the NBRRCDS parameter? > >Any ideas or thoughts,. Thanx in advance for any help. > >Rgds >Venu > > >+--- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.