|
Hank, How about Un-Common ? Chuck HankHeath@aol.com wrote: > It has been years since I've been a regular COMMON attendee. However, I > remember my wife attending one with me, and gushing about how wonderful it > was. This was in the late 80's. I suspect she might not be as impressed today. > > Which brings me to my current suggestion: why don't we form a national users > group that has periodic conferences with rules against commercial misuse of > the proceedings? You know, presentations of the technology without sales talk. > A friendly atmosphere. With programs for guests and spouses. > > I'm just at a loss as to what to call it. > > Hank Heath > Project Manager > Salt Lake City > Home office: 801-733-9716 > E-mail: HLHeath@ibm.net > > In a message dated 98-08-26 00:07:10 EDT, leo@tug.on.ca (Leo Lefebvre) wrote: > > << Subj: Re: COMMON Spouses Program > Date: 98-08-26 00:07:10 EDT > From: leo@tug.on.ca (Leo Lefebvre) > Sender: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com > Reply-to: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com > To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com (MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com), COMMON@COMMON.ORG > (Diana DelPonte) > > David (and everybody else) > > I do not know if you're right or wrong about the guest program, but let's not > make a federal case out of it. > > I will not be in Anaheim this fall but here what I think about the > 'Spouse/Guest > Program' at COMMON. > > Since Toronto in 1988 I have attended 12 COMMON conferences. Each and every > time > my wife came with me (and WILL CONTINUE TO COME regardless of the outcome of > the > so called 'Spouses' program). Each and every time I registered her to the the > program, so I know what it is like. > > During the first years, the program cost less than half of today's cost (I > beleived that in the early '80 it was only $25 -- today it goes from $100 for > early bird to $120 for on-site registration) In those days, the program was > run > (like anything else at COMMON) by volunteers and those volunteers had NO > INTEREST > in the content of the conferences. These volunteers were great, they were > helping > each other, they WERE VISIBLE and brought a lot to the conference atmosphere. > They were the ones who were selling the COMMON souvenirs in a make-shift > store in > a highly visible location in the main hotel (every conference I was buying > souvenirs from the store - since they turned it over to a 'concession' -about > six > years ago- I bought absolutely NOTHING from the souvenir shop). That was only > one > aspect to the work the 'Guest/Spouse' volunteers were doing. Organising tours > and > hosting 'properly' the 'Hospitality Suite' were other functions these > volunteers > were excellent at. > > Year after year, the program looses its shine, is less attractive and is more > expensive. What do spouses/guests get today for $100/$120: > 1) On Day-1, in the morning, a few minutes presentation about the city they > are > visiting, offers to join tours (at costs that exceed the price they would pay > for > similar tours offered by tour companies with offices in the hotels, AND ON > THE > DAY THEY SELECTED) > 2) From Day-1 (8:00AM to 5:00PM) to Day-5 (morning only) a hospitality suite > were they can grab a danish and coffee or soft drink and 'relax' for a while > ---- > BUT NO regular attendee is allowed in that room > 3) Admission to CUDS, fine, but now you have to pay for your drinks, where > is > the benefits. > > Frankly, the program is going down the drain anyway, the boat is sinking, let > it > go! unless you have MUCH BETTER ideas. > Keep your money. For $100, for 5 days, your spouse/guest can get good > breakfasts > AND lunches. For CUDS? do something else, hit the town, stay a bit longer in > the > restaurant where you're having dinner, enjoy your time with your closest > friend(s). > > If the program goes, my wife and I won't shed a tear. If will just give us > the > 'push' we needed to stop paying that $100 for less and less, conference after > conference, something we had thought about for the last couple conferences. > > I would, thought, appreciate it, if COMMON keep a 'Badge System' for > spouses/guests so that I can visit EXPO (with her) in the afternoon of Day-0, > without leaving her on her own on a Sunday afternoon. If not, I will NOT > visit > the Expo on Sunday afternoon leaving me much less time to visit the exhibits. > > > Leo >> > +--- > | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! > | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. > | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. > | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. > | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com > +--- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.