Re: Y2K problems - Armageddon or Much Ado about Nothing?

[Glenn Ericson <Glenn-Ericson@xxxxxxx>]

Don't  know that  AS/400s  will get  the blame but there are surely  firms
with AS/400s  that are sailing in the direction of failure.  At the 400
level  there will be a large ripple up effect to the BIG  Firms  like GM,
Pfizer, etc. who then will stumble as their supply chains begin to break
down.  With the 400's popularity in hospitals,  pension & welfare plans
etc.  -the Products name will surface as a player, & at fault. Reality is
the  problems are  not  so much the  AS/400 as the  applications and people
that  make the Y2K corrective decisions. 

Many  high  exposure   industries  use AS/400s like Credit Unions, Health
Education, Transportation companies & Most  hotels  use AS/400s or S/36s
for their in house &/or corporate MIS needs.   Now  lets  talk about  that
2000 New Years Eve Party that you are planning.  These, if they are to
fail, will  hit  almost immediately after Y2K.


Glenn
___________________________________________________
Glenn Ericson,          Phoenix Consulting                      
P O Box 701164   East Elmhurst NY 11370-3164 USA                            
Phone 718 898 9805       Fax 718 446 1150
AS/400 & Year 2000- - Solutions Specialists
 © 1998 copyright,  all rights reserved
____________________________________________________



At 04:16 PM 8/24/98 +0100, you wrote:
>Mike
>
>Thanks for responding.
>
>Mike Shaw wrote:
>
>> Closer to home, there was an article in last month's Wired about all of the
>> techies working Y2K that have purchased land in very remote parts and
>> building small fortresses on them in preparation for the Y2K disaster.
Yes,
>> they and their families are going underground until it is over!  I thought
>> if funny that their Sept issue that just came out has the fact that they
are
>> Y2K compliant in the front cover just under the WIRED Banner!  At the top,
>> right below the big WIRED letters is "Y2K Compliant".
>
>I gave up reading WIRED a year or more ago, but it might well be that article
>which the UK press picked up on for the US part.  Thanks for passing it on.
>
>What do you think are the answers to my Y2K question?  There is talk in
the UK
>that 1 in 10 companies will not survive the year 2000.  Is the view the same
>elsewhere?  Will any AS/400's get the blame?
>
>Rob Dixon
>Erros plc
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Mike Shaw
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rob Dixon <rob.dixon@erros.co.uk>
>> To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com>
>> Date: Monday, August 24, 1998 1:36 AM
>> Subject: Y2K problems - Armageddon or Much Ado about Nothing?
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >The UK press, both popular newspapers and technical magazines, publish
>> >ever more hysterical articles about the Y2K problem, yet it is not the
>> >most frequent topic in this group. Some articles refer as much to
>> >American as much as UK hysteria.
>> >
>> >Assuming that the members of this mailing list represent typical AS/400
>> >sites, is this apparent lack of interest because -
>> >
>> >1.  Our systems have, from the beginning, anticipated the problem?  This
>> >should be the answer!
>> >
>> >2.  All the necessary work has been done in our installations and we
>> >have moved on to more interesting problems?
>> >
>> >3.  We are working flat out to solve the problems and have not got spare
>> >time to post messages
>> >about it?
>> >
>> >Is anyone prepared to admit that they still have a serious problem?
>> >
>> >Just curious!
>> >
>> >Rob Dixon
>> >Erros plc
>> >
>>
>> +---

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---