|
Rob, First and foremost, if you are keeping your AS/400 current on OS/400, the system and licensed program products should not be a Y2K issue. I do not see the Y2K issue as an AS/400 issue, but cutting across all systems. Therefore my answer falls somewhere between questions one and two....Does 1.5 count as a correct answer! =:-) North American Mortgage is now regulated by the OTS (Office of Thrift Supervision) which is under the US Dept. of Treasury if I remember correctly. This is a result of being purchased last November by Dime Bank of New York. They have the authority to close our doors if we do not demonstrate results that make us Y2K compliant. They have been here three times auditing our progress since January. As a result, Y2K is a priority and will not be an issue here in terms of major problems. We are making strides on all platforms to demonstrate Y2K compliance. My biggest concern about Y2K is not from our own internal systems, but from those business partners that have done little or nothing to demonstrate Y2K compliance. It does not matter how well your internal systems have cleared the Y2K bar if your business partners that you depend on have not. We will be doing interface testing in the Dec 98, Jan 99 timeframe to identify who does not make the cut and plan accordingly. As a result, there are plans being drawn up for replacing those partners that cannot demonstrate Y2K compliance. If others do this as well, yes, I could see a scenario where 1 in 10 could go out of business because of Y2K. But, I think you will see the degradation in partner performance starting 2d quarter next year.... I am of the opinion that we will see some Y2K issues here in the US. Nothing that is *showstopper* and lasting no more than a week in duration. I look for it to be more of a nuisance and inconvenience. No, I am not buying a bunker located in "Parts Unknown" to sit the century change out! =:-) Regards, Mike Shaw -----Original Message----- From: Rob Dixon <rob.dixon@erros.co.uk> To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com> Date: Monday, August 24, 1998 9:07 AM Subject: Re: Y2K problems - Armageddon or Much Ado about Nothing? >> >> >> Mike Shaw >> >> >The UK press, both popular newspapers and technical magazines, publish >> >ever more hysterical articles about the Y2K problem, yet it is not the >> >most frequent topic in this group. Some articles refer as much to >> >American as much as UK hysteria. >> > >> >Assuming that the members of this mailing list represent typical AS/400 >> >sites, is this apparent lack of interest because - >> > >> >1. Our systems have, from the beginning, anticipated the problem? This >> >should be the answer! >> > >> >2. All the necessary work has been done in our installations and we >> >have moved on to more interesting problems? >> > >> >3. We are working flat out to solve the problems and have not got spare >> >time to post messages >> >about it? >> > >> >Is anyone prepared to admit that they still have a serious problem? >> > >> >Just curious! >> > >> >Rob Dixon >> >Erros plc >> > +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.