EIGRP vs. RIP -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

We recently changed our Cisco Switch/Cisco Routers/Novell & NT servers,
to accomodate TCP/IP.  In the process, we discovered that one of our
(two) remotes was experiencing extremely bad response time over frame.
Was told that this was due to change from RIP (not sure if 1 or 2) to
EIGRP (... was subsequently told that 50 routers are necessary to
benefit from EIGRP?).  Does anyone else have similar scenario? ... or
can vouch for EIGRP/RIP arguement?  ... does anyone else use Sprint for
telecom and reactively needs to call them to "optimize traffic" over
their frame?  Any and all suggestions welcome!  TIA

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.