|
On Wed, 12 Aug 1998 17:49:52 -0400, Mark Lazarus <mlazarus@ttec.com> wrote: >Gord, > >At 10:50 AM 8/11/98 -0400, you wrote: >>On the CISC box, we used to determine the number of records which would fit >>into a 32k buffer and use this in an OVRDBF to optimize the number of >>records read per physical I/O. The buffer size changed on the RISC boxes >>but I can't find the note I made on the new size. Would someone refresh my >>memory please? > > 128K. > > -mark > Thanks Mark. For some reason I thought it was higher but a search through some old messages in comp.sys.ibm.as400.misc shows this to be the consensus. Faulty memory again I guess. Gord -- Gord Hutchinson TST Overland Express ghutchinson@tstoverland.com 905-212-6330 +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.