|
I would think the "battleship" of in-place code and people that understand it and it's architecture is so great that only a brand new paradigm with brand new people would have any chance of implementation. By that, I don't mean the current people wouldn't be able to make the shift, just that in their conversations back and forth everything would be compared to the same old paradigm, just as was done in this thread a few days ago when punch cards were brought in as a way to explain a concept; punch cards have been gone for 15+ yeaars at most places. In <35BCA7E3.F8E3CB93@ibm.net>, on 07/27/98 at 09:16 AM, "James W. Kilgore" <qappdsn@ibm.net> said: >There were some soundings about the acceptance of "radical" changes in >how we do things. IMO, radical can be brought to acceptance through >logical conclusion and the demonstaration that nothing gets lost and >plenty gets gained. -- ----------------------------------------------------------- boothm@ibm.net Booth Martin ----------------------------------------------------------- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.