|
>I am in the middle of a large conversion, where during the 'big bang' - we >will encounter numerous duplicate keys. The data comes from a mainframe, >and making the file truly unique first would probably be as large a task >as the conversion itself. > >My question regards the nature of the I/O involved for a duplicate key. >Is there a way to reduce the processor time the machine uses to determine >a duplicate key exists? We looked at the file description, and nothing >was obvious. The language is COBOL, and rewriting the code is less tahn >desirable (although I personally feel a START in the proper paragraph >would do wonders)....... > >Dan Rasch - because if the human species concentrated on the really >important things in life, there would be a shortage of fishing poles! If you look at the file and the data, would adding another key field give you a unique key? --Paul E Musselman PaulMmn@ix.netcom.com +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.