RE: AS/400 History

Pete,

Perhaps that is why iv'e been so far off base on this.  Think it was 
the 38 that had 36 emulation.  But I have never had to deal with the 
36 so haven't paid to much attention.

I stand corrected.

Bob

-----Original Message-----
From:   Pete Hall [SMTP:peteh@inwave.com]
Sent:   Thursday, July 09, 1998 2:37 AM
To:     MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
Subject:        RE: AS/400 History

At 07:03 PM 7/8/98 -0500, Bob Crothers wrote:
>I think it was System/3 and 36, then System 38.  The Sys/38 had
> S36 emulation from almost day one.  How could it emulate a
>machine that didn't already exist?

No, it was the other way round. The S38 had been out for a while when 
my employer got his first S/36 right after they were released. I don't 
recall S36 emulation on the 38. There was a S/34 to S/38 conversion 
tool though. The AS/400 had S/36 emulation from day one. It was a big 
deal at the time, with much hoopla about how thoroughly beta sites had 
tested the 36EE for consistency with the "real" S/36.


Pete Hall
peteh@inwave.com
http://www.inwave.com/~peteh/

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to 
MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: 
david@midrange.com
+---

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---