RE: Question of efficiency

["Raikov, Leonid" <Raikovl1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In principal, the second configuration looks more efficient. The number
of AS/400 jobs is the same, but there are fewer telnet sessions. The
number of telnet sessions becomes even more important in case of an
unreliable network with communications recovery a function of the number
of connections.

Lo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Graap, Ken [SMTP:keg@gasco.gasco.com]
> Sent: 23 June 1998 19:48
> To:   'MidrangeL'
> Subject:      Question of efficiency
> 
> Which configuration model do you think is more efficient?
> 
> 1.) 150-200 users connecting to an AS/400 via Rumba Telnet 5250
> clients
> by initiating 
>        several separate Rumba sessions from their PC, one for each
> job.
> 
> 2.) 150-200 users connecting to an AS/400 via Rumba Telnet 5250
> clients
> by initiating 
>        1 or 2 telnet sessions and using group jobs to start and work
> with additional jobs.
> 
> Kenneth
> 
> --
> ********************************
>         Kenneth E. Graap
>   AS/400 Systems Administrator
>     NW Natural - Information Services
>              System Services
>           503 226 4211 X5537
>            FAX  503 721 2521
> ********************************
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to
> MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
> david@midrange.com
> +---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---