|
Vernon, In a message dated 98-05-30 11:33:43 EDT, you write: <<snip>> > The IBM approach does _not_ limit you to running on the 400. The > applications that you create can run on any Java virtual machine. The > 400-specificity here has nothing to do with Java. It's no different from > using Lightning in VB to talk to the 400. > > So, IMO, it's misleading to lump these approaches together, esp. to suggest > that IBM is pulling the rug out from under the portability of Java by > providing classes for 400 access. The IBM JDT _does_ limit your applications to the /400. That's it's whole raison d'etre. However, someone writing cross-platform applications would be well-served by identifying the platform on which the application is running and optimizing their code for that platform. For example, use a JDBC for all platforms, yet allow room in your code to use the /400 (or HP/9000, or DEC/VAX) extensions to make it run optimally. JMHO, Dean Asmussen Enterprise Systems Consulting, Inc. Fuquay-Varina, NC USA E-Mail: DAsmussen@aol.com "Hospitality is making your friends feel at home, even though you wish they were." -- Anonymous +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.