RE: CISC to RISC conversion of data

There is no V2R2 to V4R2 road map. Also, I will be converting 150
systems remotely so everything has to be automated as much as possible.
The simplest process is going to be to prestage the AS/400s in Rochester
with application software and then move only the user profiles and data
the night of the cutover. Since I need to have this happen as quickly as
possible I wanted to know if it would be faster to save the access paths
(which takes more time on the save operation but less time during the
restore) or not save the access paths (which requires less time on the
save but requires the access paths to be rebuilt on the restore). My
concern is that the access paths would be rebuilt anyway due to the
difference in V2R2 and V4R2. 
>
>I Agree with Kenneth's advice!
>
>And I am somebody who "knows better than IBM".  But in the case 
>of the CISC->RISC, follow the road map and everything will work. 
> Deviate, and your life will get very "interesting" on Monday 
>morning!
>
>Bob
>
>-----Original Message-----
>Good luck!
>
>Kenneth
>
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---